A recent story has drawn attention to a key piece of legislation relating to VAT liabilities on property search fees – and it could have a wider impact on conveyancing.
A law firm has been ordered to pay a £68,000 VAT bill for electronic property searches made on behalf of a local authority client. At the time, these searches were treated as disbursements – payments made by a solicitor to a third party on behalf of the client and then claimed back from the client. As the firm was acting on behalf of the client to conduct the searches, this seems an open and shut case.
However, the First-Tier Tribunal ruled in favour of HMRC that the searches should not be treated as disbursements, because the search fees were not simply a repayment of expenditure. Rather, in this instance, the searches provided the solicitors with information, which was then used in order to give advice to the client. The firm was not solely acting as the ‘middle man’ to collect the search fee from the client and therefore the charge should have formed part of the fees for the services provided by the solicitor.
The judge agreed, taking the view that the firm was engaged in transactional work at the time the searches were performed. He was also satisfied that the solicitors knew what they were doing in obtaining the searches and that they were able to carry out the searches quickly and conveniently.
In agreeing with HMRC, the judge rejected the Law Society’s argument that in obtaining the search results, this was separate from the provision of advice, and that the report compiled from the results was part and parcel of the service.
When that happened, said the judge, the search fees “should not have been treated as disbursements”, but rather as a service. Therefore VAT should have been charged on the amount, taking into consideration the overall service supplied by the solicitor, which the client pays for.
There is no doubt that the law firm in question acted in good faith, but this is an important piece of case law, which could well affect other law firms. The Law Society has said they will consider the implications of this decision for VAT and disbursements. For more information relating to VAT, or if you are a law firm and believe you may be affected by this news, contact the WK Law team today to see how we can help.
HMRC have long taken the view that most holiday camps/activities offered by regulated commercial providers are subject to VAT at 20%. Several providers have been previously assessed for VAT on this basis and in light of the recent case we strongly encourage providers in the sector to review their position if VAT is being applied. Mark Doherty, VAT Director at Wilkins Kennedy, takes a closer look at this new VAT position on school holiday camps...
In the event that the UK’s negotiation with the EU sees the end of the UK’s participation in the ‘VAT Union’, several simplifications currently enjoyed by UK VAT registered businesses will be lost. Those businesses would need to consider their future options.
Brexit is a major disruptor for businesses today and will continue to be for the foreseeable future. As the process continues, there is a clear sense of frustration in the business community over the lack of clarity on the procedures that will be placed on businesses that trade with the EU. There are things, however that you can do to help ensure you are ‘Brexit ready’ by 31 December 2020...
“Get Brexit Done” was the simple message that led to a Conservative majority in December’s general election. This has meant Boris Johnson’s ‘Brexit bill’ passed easily through the House of Commons. Indeed, the bill has now received Royal Assent so the EU (Withdrawal Agreement) Act 2020 is now in place...
The increase in popularity of Airbnb and similar accommodation providers raises the question of how these kinds of activities should be dealt with from a VAT perspective. Andy Dawbarn, Indirect Taxes Partner at Wilkins Kennedy, considers the VAT implications arising for users of these types of sites…
Charitable and non-profit making bodies are often under pressure to maximise their income-generating activities through exploiting their assets to the maximum possible extent. Whilst the reason for doing this is entirely understandable, the associated potential tax consequences can be overlooked, which can, in turn, give rise to unexpected tax liabilities. In this article, John Howard, Partner and head of Not-for-Profit at Wilkins Kennedy provides some thoughts on the issues arising.
HMRC has announced a one year delay on the implementation of VAT reverse charge to 1 October 2020. Whilst this is good news for construction businesses who were not yet prepared, it may cause additional work for those businesses who were ready to go.